Posts with tag knocked up
Posted Aug 20th 2008 3:02PM by Eric Kohn
Filed under: Comedy, Casting, New Releases, Fandom, DIY/Filmmaking, Interviews
Above: Rainn Wilson lets his hair down for The Rocker.
Fans of
Rainn Wilson's offbeat, hilarious and strangely endearing performance as Dwight Schrute on NBC's
The Office might expect him to transition into film work with straightforward comedy, and
The Rocker confirms that suspicion. However, they might not realize the serious professional motives behind his choice. In the movie, directed by
Peter Cattaneo (
The Full Grown Monty), Wilson plays a grown-up dolt named Fish with a scary fixation on classic rock. Abandoned by the band Vesuvius in his teens -- before they became a commercial phenomenon -- Fish spends the next twenty years working deadbeat jobs and wishing things happened differently. Naturally, he gets a second chance: When the opportunity rolls around to drum for his nephew's high school, Fish goes for it. Ageism and slapstick humor ensue.
While not exactly a classic,
The Rocker proves Wilson has the charisma to carry a movie. The script could use some polishing, but Wilson manages to play a completely dysfunctional human being without ever becoming an annoyance. It's a testament to his skill as an actor with calculated timing. The humor emerges from the naturalism of his performances, which make you believe in the outlandish characters he portrays. In a conversation with
Cinematical recently, Wilson elaborated on his particular strategies as his career advances, reminisced about his days as a New York theater actor, and shed some light on a few upcoming projects.
Continue reading Interview: Rainn Wilson
Posted Jul 30th 2008 2:02PM by Eric Kohn
Filed under: Comedy, Horror, New Releases, Box Office, Distribution, Exhibition

According to a report conducted by Nielsen PreView
published today in The Hollywood Reporter, R-rated comedies don't do so hot at the box office. The timing of these findings seems odd, considering that
Step Brothers made a solid $30 million last weekend, while analysts are predicting that another summer comedy slapped with the restricted label,
Tropic Thunder, will collect at least that much. Right in the middle of those two releases comes
Pineapple Express, which, like
Step Brothers and
Tropic Thunder, has a built-in core audience interested in raunchy masculine humor. The findings of this report suggest that larger audiences don't want to attend R-rated movies, but it's sort of a pointless observation because R-rated comedies are only made for people who want to see them. Everyone else can check out
You Don't Mess with the Zohan.
Of course, there is the occasional R-rated comedy
with cross-over appeal, such as
Knocked Up, but studios are probably hesitant to make many of those when a safely PG-13
Juno will suffice. Anyway, it's usually not difficult for Hollywood movies to trim a few vulgarities or the fleeting shot of exposed skin in order to knock down the rating a notch and maximize turnout. Horror films are a different story:
They usually make bank with the R-rating intact.
Speaking to the 18 and over audience here: Do ratings play any role in the movies you choose to see?
Posted Apr 2nd 2008 11:32AM by Erik Davis
Filed under: Comedy, RumorMonger, DIY/Filmmaking

Well, we knew it wouldn't be too long before writer/director's
Jason Friedberg and
Aaron Seltzer tortured us with yet another one of their awful "spoof" movies. And I put the word 'spoof' in quotations because I don't believe they're making spoof films; they're making sh*tty films. It's a whole new genre.
Moviehole tells us the two dudes behind such instant microwave classics as
Meet the Spartans and
Epic Movie will next give us
Goodie Two Shoes. Apparently, the "film" will follow "a group of friends who go on a life-changing adventure."
MH tells us the main movie being "spoofed" here is
Superbad, which means the "group of friends" in the description will probably resemble Jonah Hill, McLovin,' etc ... I wouldn't even be surprised if they threw in a few cracks at some other Apatow films like
Knocked Up and
Forgetting Sarah Marshall. What was that? The latter film hasn't even come out yet? Oh, I know -- but that won't stop these boys from spoofing it. In fact, MH says they'll also be going after Will Smith's
Hancock,
Sex and the City and
The Love Guru. WTF? So now we're writing jokes about films that haven't even hit theaters, and won't for a couple months? I can't. I won't. Where's the gun?
Continue reading Next Spoof Flick to Attack 'Superbad'
Posted Feb 21st 2008 6:32PM by Kim Voynar
Filed under: Comedy, Casting, Fandom, Fox Searchlight, Oscar Watch

Jeff Wells is
beating his drum again about Jason Reitman casting Ellen Page in the role of Juno, asserting that most high school guys -- even the dorkerific Michael Cera -- wouldn't find her attractive, much less want to have sex with her. Wells first brought this up
back in December, calling Page "great but miscast," and got ripped a new one by many of his readers for it, but maybe he just likes the abuse ... or stirring up a little controversy.
Having just interviewed a pack of highschoolers for their Oscar predictions (more on that later) and hearing what they have to say about
Juno, the film, and Ellen Page as Juno, the character, I think Wells must be smoking something, or else he's just been living out there in La-La Land for way too long.
If it's believable that women would find
Seth Rogen's character in Knocked Up sexually attractive, it's certainly plausible that high school guys would be hot for a smart girl like Juno, even if she's not a blond cheerleader with big boobs. What do you folks think? Do guys go for the smart, sassy, somewhat dorky chicks, even if they're petite and perky rather than Hollywood-hot (whatever that is)? Discuss away ...
Posted Feb 4th 2008 4:02PM by Erik Davis
Filed under: Romance, Fandom, Lists, Hold the 'Fone
What makes a film romantic? Is it the setting, the dialogue, the actors, the sex? And when your snuggling up next to your significant other this Valentine's Day, which films will you prefer to slide into the DVD player? Moviefone has assembled the definitive list -- the top 25 romance films of all time -- and now it's up to you to decide what they got right, what they got wrong and what they didn't get at all. Of course, Casablanca tops off the list at number one (is there a list in which Casablanca is not featured in the numero uno spot?), but following closely behind are Titanic (#2), Wuthering Heights (#3), An Affair to Remember (#4) and Gone with the Wind (#5). Obviously, when we're talking romance flicks, they don't make them like they used to.
When it comes to films made within the past few years, we don't find one until Brokeback Mountain shows up at number 12, followed by Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind at number 15, and last year's Atonement at 18. Personally, I have a few issues with placement -- not so much with the films themselves -- like why Sleepless in Seattle is at 25 when it should've been higher. Films that didn't make the cut? Surprisingly, not many romantic comedies made the list. Even though they rely more on humor, some of us enjoy a little laughter with our cheesy romance. That being said, why not throw When Harry Met Sally a bone? Or even last year's Knocked Up? Either way, let us know what you think about the list below -- which films belong in different spots, which don't belong on the list at all and which are your favorites?
Posted Jan 10th 2008 5:32PM by Erik Davis
Filed under: Awards, Fandom, Scripts, Oscar Watch
Well, I bet I can name one awards ceremony that won't be picketed this year, home-skillet. Yup, the WGA (Writer's Guild of America) have announced their nominees in three different screenplay categories today, and while there weren't any big surprises, one film did stand out among the rest. Nominated for best original screenplay was something called Knocked Up, written by Judd Apatow. Not sure where that one came from; I haven't seen it nominated for anything else this year, so perhaps there's a mistake somewhere. Maybe I'll write a letter:
Dear WGA: I think you're mistaken in nominating this film called Knocked Up for best original screenplay. No one else is nominating it for anything because I believe it's too funny. And, c'mon, if something is that funny, it certainly doesn't deserve a special award, right. Please remove it from your list like everyone else has been doing. Good Day.
Anyway, joining Knocked Up in the best original screenplay category is ... JUNO ... and then a bunch of other films. Do their names really matter; can't we just skip all this junk and name Diablo Cody Screenwriting Goddess of the Decade? In the best adapted category, we have names like Ethan and Joel Coen (No Country for Old Men), Paul Thomas Anderson (There Will be Blood), Ronald Harwood (The Diving Bell and the Butterfly), Sean Penn (Into the Wild) and James Vanderbilt (Zodiac). Wait. Zodiac? Holy sh*t! Someone actually remembered that film. Nice. The WGA will hold simultaneous awards ceremonies in LA and NYC on February 9.
See all the nominees after the jump, courtesy of The Hollywood Reporter.
UPDATE: Variety now tells us that the WGA-W has canceled its own awards ceremony in Los Angeles, while the WGA-E is still deciding whether they will also cancel the awards ceremony in New York.
Continue reading WGA Announces Their Award Nominees
Posted Dec 31st 2007 8:02PM by Patrick Walsh
Filed under: Fandom, New in Theaters, Home Entertainment, George Clooney, Lists, Oscar Watch, Best/Worst

The best movie year since 1999, 2007 offered a staggering bounty of cinematic delights. I keep track of all the movies I see in a given year and give each a letter grade, "A" through "F". Usually my Top Ten list consists of all of the "A's" and a few "B's." This year, "A" pictures made up my top
twenty. With so many great films, I won't wallow through a "Worst of the Year" list, I'll simply present you with a few that didn't fully satisfy:
The Biggest Disappointment: The Darjeeling Limited -- A Louis Vuitton commercial stretched to feature length.
The Darjeeling Limited is a perfect title for the film because it makes plain what a limited filmmaker the once great Wes Anderson has become. Hey Wes, people running in slow-motion while a Kinks song plays is always going to look pretty neat. But if there's absolutely nothing else going on in the scene, then that's all it is -- people running in slow-motion while a Kinks song plays. We all think it's really cool that you like The Kinks. Hell, I love those guys! The Rolling Stones are awesome, too! But I wouldn't ask them to do my job for me.
and...
The Biggest Question Mark: There Will Be Blood
Undoubtedly one of the year's most impressive technical achievements,
There Will Be Blood is frequently stunning. It's so stunning, in fact, that it's easy to overlook how infuriatingly empty it all is. The film focuses on two main characters, and neither one changes a lick in thirty years and 158 minutes. How did Paul Thomas Anderson, creator of such deeply emotional rides as
Boogie Nights, Magnolia, and
Punch Drunk Love come up with a movie completely devoid of human emotion? (I'm not counting greed.) Beautiful, brilliant, and boring in equal doses, I've seen
Blood twice, and I still don't know if it's a masterpiece or a mess. I just know I felt...nothing watching it. It's as hollow, as frustrating, as difficult to know as its "hero," Daniel Plainview.
On to my list. First, ten that didn't quite make the cut. Here's #20 through #11:
(#20) Breach, (#19) Once, (#18) The Diving Bell and the Butterfly, (#17) Sicko, (#16) Sweeney Todd, (#15) The Lives of Others, (#14) Eastern Promises, (#13) Zodiac, (#12) Atonement, (#11) Before the Devil Knows You're Dead
And my Top Ten is after the jump...
Continue reading The Ten Best Films of 2007 -- Patrick's Picks
Posted Dec 17th 2007 2:02PM by Christopher Campbell
Filed under: Drama, Awards, Lists, Cinematical Indie

The American Film Institute has
announced its picks for the ten best films of 2007, and once again it favors
Judd Apatow over
Joe Wright. Back in 2005, the organization named
The 40-Year-Old Virgin as one of the best films of that year, while ignoring Wright's
Pride & Prejudice. This time, the AFI has included
Knocked Up and left out
Atonement, despite the latter's huge presence in the Golden Globe nominations and very probable huge presence in the Oscar race. So, what's going on? Does the AFI really have something against Wright and his very Anglocentric filmmaking? Well, kind of, but only because the organization concentrates on American films (it is, after all, the
American Film Institute). To be
eligible for the year-end honors, a movie has to have "
significant creative and/or production elements from the United States." The movie can even be in a foreign language (non-English, that is) if it is "incontrovertibly American."
Tom O'Neil at the Gold Derby blog still
sees some controversy, though. He points out that
The Diving Bell and the Butterfly, which the AFI included this year, was primarily an American production (from Kennedy/Marshall Co. and American director Julian Schnabel) yet had seven foreign partners, while
Atonment (directed by a Brit) was also produced by an American company (Relativity Media) and had two foreign partners. I'd add that
The Diving Bell is no more "incontrovertibly American" in its subject matter than
Atonement -- or even
Ratatouille for that matter. While I'm not arguing that
Atonement deserved to make the list, I'd assume
American Gangster would deserve it more than
The Diving Bell, regardless of how much better the latter film may be. At least comedy fans should be happy with the inclusion of
Knocked Up, which has so far been left out of most awards season honors.
The complete list is as follows:
Knocked Up;
Juno;
Before the Devil Knows You're Dead;
No Country for Old Men;
There Will Be Blood;
Into the Wild;
Ratatouille;
The Savages;
Michael Clayton;
The Diving Bell and the Butterfly.
Posted Dec 11th 2007 3:32PM by Christopher Campbell
Filed under: Comedy, Casting, Dreamworks

There are some actors who need to stick to playing supporting roles.
Paul Rudd is not one of them -- he is good-looking and perfectly capable of being a lead -- but that doesn't mean I can't prefer him as the leading man's buddy, or as the romantic opposition, or as a member of an hilarious ensemble. But as goofy as the guy is, we have to remember that he was once just that love interest/step-brother for Alicia Silverstone in
Clueless. Fortunately, as Rudd appears to grow in Hollywood status, starring in his own vehicles, he seems to be choosing movies that relate more to his work with Judd Apatow, Adam McKay and the Stella guys than to run of the mill romantic comedies.
His latest to be announced is called
I Love You, Man, which makes one think of the joke in
Wayne's World about platonic love between two grown men (" I
LOVE you, man"). And, what do you know?
I Love You, Man is in fact about platonic love between two grown men.
According to Variety, the movie is about a guy (Rudd), who is about to get married, but who doesn't have a male friend who can serve as his best man. So, he seeks one out and eventually finds gangly
Jason Segal of TV's
How I Met Your Mother (and
Knocked Up, which co-starred Rudd).
Continue reading Paul Rudd Says 'I Love You, Man'
Posted Dec 10th 2007 1:02PM by Erik Davis
Filed under: Celebrities and Controversy, Fandom, Newsstand
What happens when you make a few lame comments about the film that skyrocketed your per flick payday from $300,000 to $6 million? Well, you call up People Magazine and "clarify" your statements. Yes, we're talking about Knocked Up's Katherine Heigl, who, while speaking to Vanity Fair magazine recently, called one of this year's funniest films "a little sexist." She then added, "It paints women as shrews, as humorless and uptight and it paints the men as lovable, goofy, fun-loving guys. It was hard for me to love the movie." Now when her comments first hit the net, I wrote a somewhat scathing post bashing Heigl for, well, bashing the film that "made her." I also said that, if anything, it was the men in the film who came off as idiots; as guys who either couldn't commit to their wives or had absolutely zero motivation in life. The two prominent women (Heigl and Leslie Mann ) were strong female role models, in my opinion. One was a successful mother, while the other was a motivated career gal.
After I wrote the post, I had plenty of people who went the whole "her comments were taken out of context" route. And that may be the case. In a new interview with People, she does allude to the fact that her statements were (kind of, sort of) taken out of context. She says, "I was responding to previous reviews about the movie the interviewer brought to my attention. My motive was to encourage other women like myself to not take that element of the movie too seriously and to remember that it's a broad comedy." Wait, where in those comments does she "encourage other women like myself to not take that element of the movie too seriously and to remember that it's a broad comedy." I missed that part.
But anyway, Heigl later goes on to say, "Although I stand behind my opinion, I'm disheartened that it has become the focus of my experience with the movie. The truth is, it was the best filming experience of my career. Every person that was a part of making Knocked Up helped to encourage, support and inspire me. I never intended for anyone to think otherwise." Fair enough. She still thinks the film is sexist, but she had a great time making it. Should we let her off the hook?
Katherine Heigl in Pictures:








Did Katherine Heigl make Cinematical's Hot List for 2007?
Find out!

Posted Dec 3rd 2007 4:02PM by Erik Davis
Filed under: Comedy, Romance, Celebrities and Controversy, Fandom, Newsstand, Fan Rant
Though she co-starred in one of the biggest (and most enjoyable) films of the year -- in a role that catapulted her from that chick on Grey's Anatomy to mega movie star -- Katherine Heigl has decided to turn around and take a giant dump on the film that "made" her. In a new interview with Vanity Fair (via Us Magazine), the actress called Knocked Up "a little sexist" and adds: "It paints women as shrews, as humorless and uptight, and it paints the men as goofy, fun-loving guys. It was hard for me to love the movie." And your point is? First up, has Heigl ever watched a romantic comedy before? Doesn't she know that not all the characters can play freaks and geeks -- that some have to play it straight in order to up the conflict, the tension and the comedy? And what's wrong with being goofy and fun-loving? Isn't that the whole point of the film -- that Heigl plays a career gal on her way to a great promotion when she gets "knocked up" by a moron?
Seriously now, if she wants to go that route, then Rogen and Rudd could easily comment and say the film portrays all men as morons; as guys who don't want to commit, who hate their lives and who have no clear goals at all. If anything, Heigl and Leslie Mann are the most level-headed out of the whole lot. I don't see that as being "uptight," I see that as being stressed out that you just received a promotion only to find out that your idiotic one-night-stand knocked you up. I mean, what was her character supposed to do in that situation? Smoke a joint and play Nintendo? Reality check for Heigl: Guys obsess over sex. The website they wanted to create is a real website that exists in the real world. These characters were based, in some ways, on real people. I hate it when these actors and actresses trash a film they were in without saying what they would've done to correct the situation. Katherine Heigl thinks Knocked Up was sexist? Well I think 27 Dresses looks like absolute sh*t. Prove me wrong.
Posted Nov 28th 2007 12:02PM by Erik Davis
Filed under: Fandom, Lists
You might not have heard of Mr. Skin prior to 2007, but once Knocked Up hit screens, Mr. Skin became a household name. And who better to throw together a top 20 nude scenes of 2007 list then the dude whose job it is to spot, record and gain access to each and every piece of big-screen nudity. It may not be the most intellectual year-end list, but it's certainly one that grabs a lot of attention. So who made the list? Who came in at number one? And would Mr. Skin throw a bone to the film that catapulted the site to nekked super-stardom? I think maybe ...
Coming in at numero uno on the top nude scenes of 2007 list was -- drum roll please -- 43-year-old (and still hot) Marisa Tomei for baring all that and then some in Sidney Lumet's Before the Devil Knows You're Dead. Tomei wastes no time in shedding off the clothes, as the film's opening shot reveals her bent over on all fours doing the nasty with Philip Seymour Hoffman. She continues to remain nude for a good hour of the film until, finally (and regretfully) she puts her clothes back on. Surprisingly, Natalie Portman's infamous nude scene in the Wes Anderson short Hotel Chevalier came in at number three (proving you can weigh 70 pounds soaking wet and still look hot), while Keeley Hazell (Cashback), Christina Ricci (Black Snake Moan) and Sienna Miller (Factory Girl) rounded out the top five. Knocked Up finally crashes the list at number 10 (with nude shots of Stormy Daniels, Nautica Thorn and a Mr. Skin plug at the fifty-nine-minute mark). Special kudos from Cinematical go out to Heather Matarazzo (18 on the list) for sporting the birthday suit in Hostel: Part II (is this the same girl from Welcome to the Dollhouse?) and Danielle Harris (17 on the list) for her nude scene in Zombie's Halloween ... after playing little Jamie Lloyd in Halloween 4 and 5 almost 20 years ago. Oh, and even though it's TV, shouldn't the cast of Tell Me You Love Me get some sort of special nudity award for 2007? Like, most uncomfortable nudity ever! It's only right ...
Check out the full list after the jump, then let us know what your favorite nude scenes of 2007 are.
[via Slashfilm]
Continue reading The 20 Best Nude Scenes of 2007
Posted Nov 22nd 2007 9:32AM by Erik Davis
Filed under: From the Editor's Desk

Today a lot of you will head off to do whatever, wherever with whomever, and if you're like me you're stoked for two reasons: a) no work and b) eating until way after the belt comes off. More power to you and yours -- and we here at Cinematical sincerely wish you a happy, healthy Thanksgiving and hope you spend the day with someone(s) or something you truly care about ... (waits for the two girls in the back corner to go "awww"). I'll be writing a list of things I'm not thankful for this year a bit later on, but I figured I'd compliment that with a list of things I am thankful for this year -- all of which are movie-related, of course. So, in no particular order:
I'm thankful for getting to experience my first film festival overseas in Berlin earlier this year, and for all those people who made fun of me in German but turned the other way so I wouldn't take notice.
I'm thankful that three of my favorite filmmakers (Wes Anderson, P.T. Anderson and the Coen brothers) put out three fantastic flicks this year (The Darjeeling Limited, There Will Be Blood, No Country for Old Men) for me to experience, debate and enjoy. I'm also thankful the Starz network decided to air Rushmore last week, allowing me to DVR it and watch it again for the first time in several years. God I love that movie.
I'm thankful for 2 Days in Paris, The Grand, Knocked Up and Superbad. They made me laugh harder than I've laughed in a long time. I will never look at a penis illustration the same way again.
I'm thankful for being given the opportunity to get up every morning and do what I love doing, alongside people I admire and respect. I'm also thankful for those comments that trash me to a point where I'm on the verge of slitting my wrists with a spork. You keep me in check, and for that I am grateful.
I'm thankful Tom Cruise didn't kill anyone.
I'm thankful the writers finally got another 15 minutes, although they deserve a lot more.
And finally, I'm thankful for HD (but not for the two different formats -- we'll get to that in another post). Back in May, my wife gave me a 46-inch Sony Bravia for my 30th birthday and I love the thing like it's my child. So pretty. So sweet. Want to pet it. Love youuuuuu.
So, what movie-related things are you thankful for this year?
Posted Nov 16th 2007 4:32PM by Christopher Campbell
Filed under: Comedy, Romance, Casting, Sony, Newsstand

Earlier this year, in
Knocked Up,
Katherine Heigl played a television personality for
E! But her character started out in a behind-the-camera role, despite the fact that she's a knock-out beauty. Now,
according to Variety, the actress has been cast in a similar part. She'll play an off-screen producer of a morning show, who also happens to be "romantically challenged," in the romantic comedy
The Ugly Truth, in which she must deal with a "chauvinistic" correspondent attempting to teach her how to find love. Here's where the plot description makes little sense: "His clever ploys, however, lead to an unexpected result." Unexpected? I think we all can easily predict and expect the result as being that Heigl's character falls for the correspondent. Anyone who has ever seen a screwball romantic comedy can see that one coming a mile away. When is Hollywood going to just own up to the fact that they use genre conventions and that we in the audience enjoy genre conventions (and have enjoyed them for a century now) and leave out the "unexpected" crap? Who do they think they're kidding?
The sad thing is that this not only sounds like another genre picture; it actually sounds more like the plot of
Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgandy. But fans of that movie may not be interested in
The Ugly Truth, which is being made by the collaborative team behind
Legally Blonde. The script was written by
Karen McCullah Lutz and
Kristen Smith, who last gave us
She's the Man (which I'm still not ashamed to admit I enjoyed), and it will be directed by
Robert Luketic, whose last movie was
Monster-in-Law (which I'm still not ashamed to admit I would never ever watch). Filming is set to begin mid-April. All we need now is a hot, irresistible, but believably chauvinistic actor to play the obvious love interest.
Posted Nov 13th 2007 5:02PM by Patrick Walsh
Filed under: Comedy, Drama, Romance, Fandom, Scripts, Home Entertainment

Friday night I got the opportunity to attend a talk with three of my writing heroes: "The Jack Oakie Celebration of Comedy in Film featuring Judd Apatow, James L. Brooks and Larry Gelbart."
James L. Brooks is one of the major reasons I started writing. I saw
Terms of Endearment when I was a little kid and sobbed like...that little kid in
Terms of Endearment. I have seen
Broadcast News fifty times, and consider it perhaps the finest romantic comedy ever written.
As Good As It Gets is a modern classic, I loved
I'll Do Anything, and even have a soft spot in my heart for
Spanglish. Oh, plus
The Mary Tyler Moore Show, Taxi, and the guy has been with
The Simpsons from day one! No further questions, your honor.
Brooks' incredible skill of seamlessly blending laughter and heartbreak clearly made a huge influence on
Judd Apatow (although from reading all the articles about him, you'd think Apatow invented the practice). Like Brooks, Apatow did a lot of television work (the classics
Larry Sanders Show, Freaks and Geeks, and
Undeclared), and lately he's written and directed two of the best film comedies of the decade --
The 40 Year-Old Virgin and
Knocked Up.
Larry Gelbart wrote
Tootsie (with
Murray Schisgal) -- one of the greatest screenplays ever penned, comedy or otherwise. That script earned him an Oscar nomination, as did
Oh God! He earned Emmy nominations for writing, producing, and directing episodes of the classic sitcom
M*A*S*H, and his writing career spans more than 50 years.
These three dudes on one stage, plus little cameos from the likes of
Garry Shandling,
Leslie Mann, and
Jonah Hill. It was quite a night. Apatow kicked off the evening by sharing that he had been in that very theater as a boy, to see Steven Spielberg's notorious flop
1941. "I thought this was about comedy," quipped Gelbart.
Continue reading AMPAS Event: Celebration of Comedy in Film with Judd Apatow, James L. Brooks and Larry Gelbart
Next Page >