Posts with tag FantasticFour
Posted Jan 24th 2008 1:02PM by Jessica Barnes
Filed under: Action, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Deals, RumorMonger, 20th Century Fox, DIY/Filmmaking, Movie Marketing, Comic/Superhero/Geek

OK, correct me if I am wrong here, but did anyone really enjoy the last two
Fantastic Four movies so much that a third installment is really necessary? I guess when the last film raked in $131,921,738, Fox figured they might as well take another shot. IESB recently got the chance to
speak with Ms. Invisible herself,
Jessica Alba, about the possibility of a third film. For those of us out there who thought the first two were a waste of time and celluloid, don't worry, it looks like we might have the writer's strike to thank for a delay. Alba tells IESB, "I know the writers strike and the impending actors strike has kind of put a wrench in everything production wise. That film takes a lot of prep, a good six months of prep and about six months to shoot. With the strike, I think, maybe it's put on hold."
The first two films were directed by
Tim Story, who is currently working on the feel-good sports movie,
Patriots, with
Forrest Whitaker. So, if a
Fantastic sequel is delayed, there is still plenty of time to get Story back at the helm for a third film. News of a third
Fantastic film first surfaced back in June; however, while most reports pointed towards a reunion with the Silver Surfer, Alba made no mention of it in her interview with IESB. As for the rest of the cast,
Ioan Gruffudd (Mr. Fantastic),
Michael Chiklis (The Thing), and
Chris Evans (Human Torch), I can only assume they would all be on board for another film. As long as there is some "gold in these hills," it looks like Fox is going to milk the quartet for all they are worth.
Posted Jul 31st 2007 12:01PM by chris ullrich
Filed under: Action, Drama, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Scripts, Comic/Superhero/Geek, Remakes and Sequels, ComicCon

During Thursday's Comic-Con International in San Diego, I sat in on a pretty interesting panel comprised of some of the most talented and successful screenwriters, comic book writers and producers working in the business today. The panel was called
Adapting Comics for the Screen and the list of people offering opinions and insight were the perfect group to be asking about this topic.
On the panel were
Mark Verheiden,
Kevin Feige,
Mark Fergus,
Don Payne and the legendary
Stan "The Man" Lee who even at his age, was just as sharp, funny and charming as he could be and shows no signs of slowing down. As a writer myself, I was particularly interested in this panel of experts and how they have taken comics and translated them for the big screen.
First off each of the panel was introduced by moderator Jeff Goldsmith of
Creative Screenwriting magazine and as he read the list of the assembled people's credits, films like
Iron Man,
Children of Men,
Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer,
Battlestar Galactica and most of the major characters of the Marvel Universe, I grew even more interested to hear what these very accomplished men had to say.
Continue reading Comic-Con: The 'Adapting Comics For The Screen' Panel
Posted Jul 22nd 2007 9:02PM by Christopher Campbell
Filed under: Sci-Fi & Fantasy, New Line, Newmarket, Sony, Universal, Warner Brothers, 20th Century Fox, George Lucas, Peter Jackson, Cinematical Seven, Remakes and Sequels, Lists

In this day and age you can do anything with special effects. But can you do it well? I believe that you can, but Hollywood doesn't seem to be in agreement with my belief. Studios continue to put out movies with special effects that disappoint, and I think it is disrespectful to audiences. Either figure it out, or leave it out. Every time I see a bad effect in a movie, I know it could have been done better, or more imaginatively, and it frustrates the heck out of me. The worst is when I see a bad effect in a movie with mostly great effects, such as in The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King.
A visual effect doesn't have to be great or even realistic as long as it works with the story and is believable -- I'll take Harryhausen or Henson over most of the CGI attempts lately. Unfortunately, Hollywood seems to half-heartedly strive for greatness and realism with every movie, and more often than not it fails to achieve either. In my thirty years I've seen some terrible visual effects, some only terrible in retrospect, some only terrible in perspective with what else has been done. I'm not usually surprised by bad effects, though, because I've developed a cynicism about effects, particularly about CGI, that causes me to expect the worst. Nonetheless, I've picked seven movies that did actually surprise me -- a lot.
1. King Kong (2005)
In The Return of the King, Peter Jackson has some bad effects shots, but at least they're just shots. In his next film, King Kong, he has bad effects sequences. And as with The Return of the King, they are all the more apparent and all the more frustrating because there are actually some great effects shots and sequences in King Kong (it did deserve the Oscar). The worst example in Kong is the dinosaur stampede. At first the sequence is tolerable because the dinos are rendered beautifully and the weak green-screen compositing is not any worse than what many of us grew up with. But as the sequence progresses, the interaction between the actors and the computer-generated dinos looks too fake, too much like something made long ago, before computers were even used. Both the part on the cliff and the part where the animals fall over each other are sloppy and unacceptable. It is a completely ironic sequence, too, since it begins with an exchange about movies looking real. At least someone thought to score the thing sped up with "Yakkety Sax" or it wouldn't be completely useless.
Continue reading Cinematical Seven: Movies That Surprised Me With Their Bad Special Effects
Posted Jun 21st 2007 2:31PM by Tommy DiChiara
Filed under: George Lucas, Harry Potter, Remakes and Sequels, Best/Worst, Hold the 'Fone, Summer Movies
Everywhere you look this summer, there's a poster for another movie sequel: a third Ocean's installment, a second Fantastic Four, a fifth go-around with the hapless Hogwarts crew of Harry Potter ... So in honor of 95% of the season's flicks being part twos, threes or fives, Moviefone decided to rank the 25 worst movie sequels of all time. Why be so negative, you may ask? Why focus on the steaming piles of cinematic horse manure when we could focus on all the gleaming gold? Well, for one, Moviefone has already ranked the 25 best movie sequels of all time. And for another, there's a whole lot of crap out there -- and it's damn fun to write about it.
In fact, there's so much excrement in the vast universe of sequels that we had to be a bit discerning when coming up with our "top" 25 worst. As much as it broke our hearts to omit Teen Wolf, Too and Leprechaun: Back 2 tha Hood (yes, that is a real movie), we had to limit our picks to sequels that we actually thought -- even for a brief moment -- might be good. And although we admire Jennifer Aniston's stellar work in the original Leprechaun, our hopes weren't exactly high for any of the follow-ups. On the other hand, we were super stoked for Star Wars: Episode I -- The Phantom Menace before George Lucas crushed our spirits by introducing us to the most galactically annoying character in movie history (damn you, Jar Jar!).
What do you think are the worst sequels of all time? Did we miss any on our list? And, most importantly, when can we expect another Leprechaun movie?
Posted Jun 16th 2007 8:02PM by Scott Weinberg
Filed under: Action, Comedy, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Theatrical Reviews, 20th Century Fox, Comic/Superhero/Geek, Remakes and Sequels

Superhero fans have got it made these days: You want dark and gloomy, you head for the newest
Batman movie. You crave earnest and wholesome, you pick one of the three
Spider-Man flicks. Whatever mood you happen to be in, there's now a superhero movie (or series) to pick through:
Hulk,
Daredevil,
Hellboy,
Superman,
Ghost Rider, you name it. Just about all the classic superheroes are now available in cinematic form, some good and some bad, some "dark and gloomy" and others all "touchy feely" ... but where's the "family friendly" superhero movie? The one that doesn't deal with tortured psyches, metaphysical angst or some form of anguished misery? Well heck, here's one: It's called
Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer, and while it's often a pretty goofy little movie, it's also a perfect flick for young dads and their 9-year-old sons.
To call
FF2 an improvement over
its predecessor would be damning the sequel with faint praise. Aside from a few editorial missteps and a leading lady who still couldn't act warm if you set her hair on fire, there's quite a lot to enjoy in
Fantastic Four 2: The actors seem a lot more comfortable with their strange roles, the jokey material is a lot less dorky, and (best of all) the sequel has an actual STORY that's both cohesive and surprisingly compelling. Sometimes it's OK to enjoy a mindless piece of popcorn escapism, one that's as broadly silly as it is colorfully exciting -- and maybe it's just a case of "lowered expectations" (seeing as how I didn't much care for the first FF entry) -- but there's something strangely infectious about the
Fantastic Four sequel. (Plus, the flick clocks in at 91 minutes and is firmly PG-rated, which should be double good news for the movie-hoppin' parents out there.)
Continue reading Review: Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer -- Scott's Review
Posted Jun 13th 2007 3:32PM by Christopher Campbell
Filed under: Action, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Comic/Superhero/Geek, Remakes and Sequels

According to the LA Times today, 20th Century Fox is already
prepping a solo spin-off for the Silver Surfer. The Marvel character features in
Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer, opening this weekend, and Fox is apparently hoping that pic performs well enough to give the Surfer his own movie, because the studio has hired comic book writer/screenwriter
J. Michael Straczynski to pen the thing. Straczynski has written for a number of Marvel titles, including the new series
Silver Surfer: Requiem, he created the sci-fi series
Babylon 5 and he recently delivered scripts for
The Changeling, to be directed by Clint Eastwood, and the zombie adaptation
World War Z. The LA Times article claims the Silver Surfer movie would be darker in tone than the new
Fantastic Four sequel, possibly in response to fan criticisms of the sequel's PG rating. I've never actually read the Silver Surfer comics, so I'm not sure how dark is appropriate for the character, but I'll always take a more grown-up comic adaptation than something geared toward young children.
More exciting for me is the news, also mentioned in the LA Times piece, that
Thor may soon have a director. Unlike the Surfer comics,
The Mighty Thor was a title I followed for years, and so far the closest thing I've had to seeing the hero/god on the big screen is his 'cameo' in
Adventures in Babysitting (and I doubt he'll be in
the remake). Supposedly
Layer Cake director
Matthew Vaughn is in negotiations to helm the comic adaptation, which was
greenlit last summer and which has a script by
Mark Protosevich (
Poseidon). I'm not a huge fan of Vaughn's directorial style and I was happy when he dropped out of
X-Men: The Last Stand (though now I think he'd have done better), but I'm willing to give him a chance with Thor. I think his style may actually be appropriate for the god of thunder. Besides, we've so far only seen one film from him; his next,
Stardust, arrives in August.
[via
JoBlo and
Moviehole]
Posted Jun 10th 2007 2:02PM by Ryan Stewart
Filed under: Action, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, Deals, Warner Brothers, Comic/Superhero/Geek, Remakes and Sequels
What happens to a director who helms three unwatchable films in a row? Well, it depends on how much money they make, obviously. After coming out with the snore-fest Barbershop, then following that up with the universally-panned comedy Taxi and directing a braindead adaptation of beloved comic Fantastic Four, Tim Story is now being handed the keys to another comic franchise, The Losers. The plot, which has gone through several permutations over the years, revolves around a bunch of Army misfits during WWII who are betrayed, then go on a mission to find out who set them up and why. HR reports that the movie "will be a one-off but with sequel potential," which I guess goes without saying. Interestingly, the adaptation that's getting greenlit was written by Peter Berg, who was set to direct but changed his mind for unspecified reasons.
Next week, of course, Story will see the release of Fantastic Four 2: Rise of the Silver Surfer, a film I really can't believe they let him direct after the way he handled the first one, but there you go. Silver Surfer reunites the original cast and adds a planet-surfing scout for a planet-devouring villain, who has a very familiar voice. We recently conducted a reader Q&A with the co-screenwriter of the film, Don Payne, and you can read some of the questions and answers from that by clicking here.
Posted Jun 6th 2007 9:01AM by Scott Weinberg
Filed under: Action, Comedy, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, 20th Century Fox, Interviews, Comic/Superhero/Geek, Remakes and Sequels

The last time
we spoke with
Don Payne, it was just before his screenwriting debut (
My Super Ex-Girlfriend) hit the multiplexes. Since that time he's been hard at work as a writer/producer on
The Simpsons, finishing up his screenplay for
Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer, and bracing himself for a powerful barrage of fanboy nitpickery. So when I spoke with Mr. Payne about spilling some
Fantastic beans for the Cinematical readers, he said "Hey, why not open the floor to some questions from everyone?" And so we did. Several readers followed
the instructions carefully and sent in some very solid questions. So here they are!
Q: Will
Victor Von Doom / Doctor Doom be more like the comic book version this time? Two major shortcomings of the movie version was the tepid romantic triangle with
Sue (which never occurs in the comics) and the business mogul backstory that was almost exactly like
Norman Osborn's from the first
Spider-Man movie. Will
Latveria at least be mentioned?
A: Doom is going to be less like the Norman Osborn-esque billionaire and more like the Dr. Doom we all know and love -- with a scientific mind that rivals Reed's. While you can't just ignore how the character was set up in the first film, I think we're getting much closer here to the Doom in the comics. Personally, I would love to see him stride into the U.N. in full armor as ruler of Latveria in a future film.
I don't want to spoil anything Latverian, but we DID see his body being shipped there at the end of the first film. As far as the romantic triangle from the first film goes, that storyline is over. There is no reference to it in this movie.
Q: The trailer seems to indicate
Galactus' energies were responsible for the storm that gave the Four their powers. Is this the case? Was this inspired by the
Heroes Reborn run, or just something that seemed natural?
A: In my mind, there is mysterious, matter-altering, cosmic "stuff" in the universe which was present in both the storm which hit the FF in the first film and the energy that Galactus wields. However, that's not explicitly stated in the movie -- other than a line where Reed says the cosmic radiation causing anomalies around the world is "not unlike" that which gave the FF their powers. But the cosmic event in the first film and Galactus are otherwise completely unrelated. It was not inspired by the
Heroes Reborn run. (But that was a fun run.)
Continue reading Your Questions Answered from 'Silver Surfer' Screenwriter Don Payne!
Posted May 30th 2007 4:32PM by Christopher Campbell
Filed under: Action, Sony, Comic/Superhero/Geek, Remakes and Sequels

In a story about this summer's blockbuster franchises and the plans for their continuation,
iF Magazine shares this interesting quote from Sony Pictures chairperson Amy Pascal: "If you want the kind of longevity we're hoping for with
Spider-Man, you have to think of them as stand-alone movies, not '1-2-3-4'. They're sort of like the James Bond stories." I find this statement quite amusing considering the definite three-part story arc followed in the first few
Spider-Man movies. Plus, if Sony didn't mean for us to think of each as a numerical installment, the studio might have wanted to title the sequels differently than
Spider-Man 2 and
Spider-Man 3. They should have done something more along the lines of
The Dark Knight or
Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer.
But thinking of the
Spider-Man series as being like the 007 franchise would make it okay for Sony to replace
Tobey Maguire in the role of Peter Parker/Spider-Man, which could happen if the actor refuses the
reported $20 million offer to return. Sony is currently looking for screenwriters to pen
Spider-Man 4, though the studio has
already been talking with
David Koepp, who wrote the first installment, about signing on. Koepp is also responsible for writing the
next Indiana Jones movie, a fourth installment in a franchise that does actually consist of stand-alone parts. Whoever is hired for the script, though, it may, according to Pascal's statement, be more of a one-shot rather than the beginning of another trilogy (the studio is apparently interested in at least three more films). Perhaps they can title it one of the following number-less suggestions:
Spider-Man: Maximum Carnage;
Spider-Man and the Lizard's Tale;
Doc Octopussy. Or, if they re-cast and reboot, a la
The Incredible Hulk:
The Amazing Spider-Man;
The Spectacular Spider-Man;
Web of Spider-Man; etc.
Continue reading Sony Looking for 'Spider-Man 4' Scripters, Source Says
Posted May 29th 2007 4:33PM by Christopher Campbell
Filed under: Action, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, 20th Century Fox, Movie Marketing, Comic/Superhero/Geek

It seems I no longer need to worry -- or rant -- about the American government selling itself out for ad space. The Silver Surfer quarters that I
complained about on Friday were not
actually made with any cooperation from the U.S. Mint*. In fact, a press release from the Mint states the coins are "in no way approved, authorized, endorsed or sponsored by the United States Mint, nor is [the movie promotion] associated or affiliated with the United States Mint."
According to a spokesperson from 20th Century Fox, neither the studio nor the Franklin Mint meant to imply the U.S. Mint was involved, and certainly neither meant to break the law. But the marketing stunt may in fact be in violation, because it is illegal to turn federal money into an advertisement. This appears to be exactly what Fox and Franklin have done, since the 40,000 Silver Surfer coins are modified versions of actual U.S. quarters originally minted and circulated by the government in 2005.
It is hard to understand exactly how Fox and Franklin think the promotion, which advertises the website for the movie
Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer, did not imply the coins are real, legal tender. Though the Franklin Mint often produces collectible and commemorative coins, it does not usually distribute them for free by dumping them into circulation. The Silver Surfer quarters were sent into the currency stream last week and all are expected to be in circulation by the end of the Memorial Day weekend. If neither Fox nor Franklin means for them to be accepted as real money, then how are they to be distributed? So far neither company has been issued a fine or other legal ramification, but we'll see if something more happens with the story once the business week begins.
*Thanks to commenter Alex C. for tipping me off about the follow-up story. Posted May 25th 2007 6:32PM by Christopher Campbell
Filed under: Sci-Fi & Fantasy, New Releases, 20th Century Fox, Movie Marketing, Comic/Superhero/Geek, Remakes and Sequels

I'm fine with the government providing financial assistance to the movie industry (via subsidies and such), but when it is directly involved with the marketing of a film, I think that's a bit too much.
The U.S. Mint has gotten together with * the Franklin Mint and 20th Century Fox to
create a limited edition version of the U.S. quarter that features an image of the Silver Surfer on the tails side. These coins, which have already been released into circulation, also include the address for the
Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer website. There are only a total of 40,000 out there, so if you manage to find one, you might not want to go and use it in a vending machine; you should probably hold on to it. Besides the fact that it's a collectible (people are already selling them on eBay), there's also a contest open only to people who find one of the coins -- with the prize being a trip to the London premiere of
FF:ROTSS.
Recently another government agency, the U.S. Postal Service, participated in movie marketing by
placing 400 R2D2 mailboxes on sidewalks throughout the country. Of course, this was to celebrate the anniversary of a movie (also released by Fox) that has become something of a national treasure. The Silver Surfer coins are less forgivable because they advertise a new release that may not even be a big success. For that reason, the stunt seems to imply that our government agencies are for sale to advertising agencies. What, now, would stop the Federal Reserve from replacing George Washington with
Spider-Man on limited edition one-dollar bills? How about we offer up the sides of government buildings and vehicles (including military vehicles, too) for logos and billboards? And why not have the President tell us to drink Coca-Cola at the end of his State of the Union speech?
*For a follow-up on this story, which points out that the U.S. Mint was not involved, check out the following post:
Silver Surfer Quarters Are Not Legal CurrencyPosted May 14th 2007 8:01PM by Scott Weinberg
Filed under: Action, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, 20th Century Fox, Comic/Superhero/Geek, Remakes and Sequels

Yes, that's right:
You could co-(co-co-co-etc.) interview
Mr. Don Payne, Emmy-winning writer-producer on
The Simpsons and non-Oscar-winning screenwriter of last summer's
My Super Ex-Girlfriend. Mr. Payne, who doesn't need to change his name if he decides to take up pro wrestling, also co-wrote this summer's highly-anticipated
Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer ... and
Cinematical's got the access to get your questions answered! Got a query regarding
Fantastic Four 2 that you need answered? Then you've come to the correct movie blog, my friends, because Don wants to answer it!
All you have to do is jot your question(s) down in an email,
send the email to this address, and then wait patiently until I can turn the questions and answers into something approximating legible articles. I could have cobbled together 12 or 15 interview questions on my own, but we decided to spread the wealth for a bunch of reasons: A) I
already interviewed the man last year -- but that was way too early for us to start discussing
FF2, B) I'm really very lazy, and C) We want serious questions from hardcore
Fantastic freaks as well as fans of Payne's other work. So if there's something you want to know about Silver Surfer, Dr. Doom, Galactus, The Thing, The Flame Kid, The Stretchy Dude or Inviso-hottie -- now's your chance! It's queryin' time!
(Note: Mr. Payne may opt to skip questions that are A) silly, B) redundant or C) spoileriffic. Don't take it personally.)Posted Apr 25th 2007 1:31PM by Jessica Barnes
Filed under: Action, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, 20th Century Fox, Comic/Superhero/Geek, Remakes and Sequels

Since it did not stand up to some of the buzz surrounding
the other superhero flick this summer, the sequel to
Fantastic Four has had a relatively low profile. There have already been a
few sets of posters so far, and now Marvel.com is hosting
10 new international posters for
Fantastic Four 2: Rise of The Silver Surfer. The one-sheets have been pretty consistent, and these latest posters are no different. Giving us a look at all 4 heroes decked out in their "spandexed" best. We also get another look at the
Surfer himself, and now since we know
what he is going to sound like too, a pretty clear picture is starting to emerge for fans.
Director
Tim Story has already
promised fans a definite improvement from the last film -- namely more action. Opinions have
varied so far on whether a sequel can deliver, although considering the reaction the trailer
received back in December, expectations seem pretty low to begin with. It's not like this latest round of posters is going to convince anyone to see the film who wasn't planning on it already. Although I'm sure a 30-foot
Jessica Alba in a skin-tight cat suit will draw at least a few glances. Considering no one was all that excited about this sequel in the first place, any
talk of a third film is going to have to wait until opening weekend.
Posted Apr 19th 2007 6:01PM by Scott Weinberg
Filed under: Action, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, 20th Century Fox, Comic/Superhero/Geek, Remakes and Sequels

A few excited websites got the news half-right a couple days back: Yes, it's true that
the man who played Morpheus will provide a voice in Fox's
Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer. But no, that voice will not belong to "Galactus, Eater of Planets." Mr. Fishburne will voice the title character himself. Silver Surfer: Body by
Doug Jones, Powers by Weta Digital, Voice by Laurence Fishburne.
You'd think that with a voice like his, Mr. Fishburne would be a veteran when it comes to voice-over work, but as far as I can tell, his only experience in this arena lies as the narrator in
TMNT and with some material for the
Matrix video
games. (How has he not been given a job by Pixar or DreamWorks Animation yet? The guy's a natural!) Needless to say, the addition of Laurence Fishburne to any project raises both the Geek Quotient and the Bad-Ass Factor -- exponentially.
But the important question (and by "important" I mean "really nerdy) is this:
Does Laurence Fishburne possess the appropriate pipes to play the platinum powerhouse? I ask the old-school Marvel fans: As you read the Silver Surfer character, does his voice sound anything like Larry Fishburne's? I don't know much about the character, but I always figured he'd sound something like C-3P0.
Posted Apr 15th 2007 2:01PM by Ryan Stewart
Filed under: Action, Sci-Fi & Fantasy, New Releases, Fandom, 20th Century Fox, Movie Marketing, Comic/Superhero/Geek, Remakes and Sequels
Eight weeks before Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer hits theaters, a number of Youtube videos have popped up featuring a giggly fat man in silver body paint and bald cap who walks around what looks like Venice interacting with the locals and declaring himself to be the real Silver Surfer, as opposed to the toned figure on the billboards. "I wanted to play myself and they said 'no.' I wanted to play Mr. Fantastic and they said 'no.' Racism. It's because of my skin color." I'll say this for Fox's viral marketing department -- at least these clips are mildly amusing. The best one features the chubby Surfer actually attempting to surf. "It's a beautiful morning," he says, chatting up a guy next to him who is also about to go out. "Kind of reminds me of the great deepness of space, you know? Kind of goes on forever." He then takes a running start at the water and freaks out because the water is too cold.
The other three videos aren't quite as good as the surfing one, and the one where he offers "surfing lessons from the Silver Surfer" on the street corner cuts way too fast for us to discern anything about what's going on. Fox should hire a cameraman who knows the principles of comedy a little better. Nevertheless, like I said, it's pretty funny if you're looking for something to watch on a rainy day, as it actually is today. I'll close by reiterating the point of the whole thing -- Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer opens in theaters on June 15.
Next Page >