Go Ahead and Disregard That New Entertainment Weekly Cover
Filed under: Sci-Fi & Fantasy, New Releases, Warner Brothers, Family Films, Newsstand, Harry Potter
This is the cover of the new Entertainment Weekly, which hit newsstands today, approximately 24 hours after its top story became outdated. As you've heard by now, Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince is no longer the most-anticipated movie of the fall; it's now the most-anticipated movie of July 17, 2009. Whoops.This bit of unfortunate timing is particularly cruel given that Entertainment Weekly and Harry Potter distributor Warner Bros. are both owned by Time Warner Inc. As EW's Jeff Giles writes in a must-read entry on the magazine's blog, "EW and Warner Bros. share a parent company, but they clearly do not share, you know, important friggin' information." (For the record, Cinematical is owned by Weblogs Inc., which is owned by AOL, which is also owned by Time Warner. But if Entertainment Weekly isn't in the loop on major corporate decisions, you can imagine how out of it we are. We're like the distant hillbilly cousins who show up at the family reunion, have no idea who anyone is, and gorge ourselves on pie.)
Considering EW is Time Warner's flagship entertainment magazine, you'd think someone at corporate would have given them a heads-up before their Fall Movie Preview went to press. While the announcement about the date change wasn't made until Thursday, surely the execs at Warners didn't just wake up that morning and say, "Hey, let's move Harry Potter today!" Surely the decision was at least a few days in the making.
On the other hand, it did seem to happen pretty suddenly. Giles points out that Half-Blood Prince's teaser trailer (complete with the November release date) is attached to Star Wars: The Clone Wars, in theaters today. If Warners had made the decision in time, they'd have nipped that in the bud, too. So either the decision really wasn't made until yesterday, or else some family members are too good at keeping secrets from one another.
Related Headlines
Reader Comments
(Page 1)2. hahaha, this is all pretty funny. i just read the news over at DeadlineHollywoodDaily. Time Warner should learn a bit or two about corporate synergy from NBC Universal, even with the late decision (so they said), they should still have been able to avoid this blunder.
Posted at 3:26PM on Aug 15th 2008 by tv junkie









1. I laughed when I saw Daniel Radcliffe in my mailbox. The boy's been on Entertainment Weekly a ton of times, he's got to be nearing a record. Then I read "Fall Movie Preview" and cringed.
Time Warner, and more importantly AOL always makes stupid decisions, and it is pretty mindless that they didn't let EW in on the "Secret". Lame.
Not that it isn't a good article though, I'm sure it's great :) AOL just sucks... how is it still a COMPANY?!?!
Posted at 2:58PM on Aug 15th 2008 by MCW